I just read the review by Pope Benedict XVI's book Marcello Pera (current Senator and former chairman of the Senate). I do not know if you tell me more puzzled or disgusted. The title that Corriere.it decided to choose for this review is typical: " Dialogue between religions is not possible. Faith can not be put in brackets.
I will mention the steps that I think "iconic", add a brief comment and will leave you to do your idea (I have no ambitions to single thought, I ...):
- "I've been less impressed by His analysis of freedom and the analysis multiculturalism in which she shows the internal contradictions of this concept and therefore its cultural and political impossibility. Of central importance is his analysis of what may be Europe and a European constitution in which Europe does not become a cosmopolitan reality, but is, from its liberal-Christian foundation, its own identity. Particularly significant for me even your analysis of the concepts of interreligious and intercultural dialogue. "
How to say" but that multiculturalism is a key ???", the prevailing culture and enlightened (in fact it takes much stress on the roots Europe's Christian ..) which absorbs all other cultures ... result: no multiculturalism is uniculturalità!
- "She said very clearly that inter-religious dialogue in the strict sense of the word is not possible, while the more urgent to intercultural dialogue that explores the cultural consequences of the decision of religious background. While on the latter is not a real dialogue possible without putting their faith in brackets must be addressed in public debate the cultural consequences of the decisions of religious background. Here the dialogue and mutual adjustment and mutual enrichment are possible and necessary. "
That is, dialogue presupposes that all the "dialogue partners" are on the same basis? No way! We Truth! Then turn it into a conversation in which "we" are there on the desk and stick all of the other alleged inaccuracies religions ... well back then cheerfully dell'apologia ...
- "[...] the parable liberal ethics. She shows that liberalism, without ceasing to be liberal, but on the contrary to be true to himself, can connect with a doctrine of good, in particular Christian congener that is, giving you really contribute to overcoming the crisis. " With
liberalism means the doctrine that the market will regulate itself, the laissez faire , or of "capitalism"? Because if answer is yes, then it would be fun to connect it with a doctrine of good ... "Capitalism Catholic" ... chills ... and there will be no credit crunch ... or if there were, do not worry because heaven is the poor! PS
the pope, during the credit crunch, he said, if I remember correctly, that this was the fact that people had thought more about money than God ... it would be interesting to try to go to the super manager to mass more often and see if anything changes in the world of high finance ...
review source: http://www.corriere.it/cultura/08_novembre_23/lettera_papa_benedetto_f01cee2c-b93f-11dd-bb2c-00144f02aabc.shtml
Salvo Di Rosa
Did you like the article? OK, and then votes help us spread this Blog!
You can vote in my news this page.
You can vote in my news this page.
0 comments:
Post a Comment