iperaffollate beaches, villages and towns ... nothing and no one is exempt from the curse of the cherry!
What I talk about that image is increasingly recurrent abdominal and bristling "pompatissimi" chest encircled by epidermal T-shirts with two beautiful cherry red out!
few years ago, who had dared to show off a pink shirt (only female head) would have attracted giggles and poisonous comments.
The sentence was final: homosexuality, or a horrible
The eccentricity ... fashion has decided that man can, indeed must, wear pink shirts. So be it.
A leader does not "like", "use". The result is an aesthetic rather than passively accepted the result of individual perceptions of taste.
The "x" of this perfect mechanism is undoubtedly the contemporary mass media!
In this era of reality television, papers and players who can influence the desires of the average man than the telly? Three players will improvise
nice marketing professionals and founded a fashion house, started wearing the garments themselves "created" (thus reducing the costs of advertising bone) and the exploding craze little heart.
Shirts absolutely become the common "non plus ultra" of desirability.
blockbusters arrive on the market and are sold at astronomical prices (given the banality of the idea).
certainly do not mean an isolated case! If today
T-shirts of the boys look like a fruit salad, long ago, dancing was a huge flowery meadow of daisies. Besides, in conformity
middle class (the one that most carefree can have sufficient resources to be able to "follow" the fashion) is not a discovery of recent years.
What is attention, however, what is happening class in the middle between the "great proletariat" and the wealthy bourgeoisie . This class
always yearns to be accepted by the bourgeoisie, despite some obvious shortcomings (different according to individual cases: insufficient resources, low education, etc.).
Well, today this sub look upon the possibility of achieving, at least notionally, the purpose.
This allowed the burgeoning market for counterfeits.
All goods that are the hallmark of a mass membership or identity of a group, are immediately Tarot (unlikely shirts Dolce & Gabbana, Gucci glasses that not even he remembers having created and so on and so forth!).
Certainly globalization, which is nothing but a conformity to global, will lead to the birth of a great-looking uniform social class (we are already all the richer because we have all three phones each, as you said some time ago Our ex-Prime Minister), but intestinal heterogeneous, complex and problematic.
Everything else will be "out" out of fashion, out of the culture outside of major political and economic processes. As predicted
Pasolini in his speech on the hair, "a the biggest risk (in terms of socio-cultural) to which we encounter, among the mechanisms of conformism, is a symbol that is emptied of its meaning to be a worn empty icon (see the case of Che Guevara ).
It may even happen that a particular symbol, after being emptied of its original meaning, is given an entirely different connotation.
On the other hand, the hairdressing haired expressed at the beginning, "things" on the left.
After being overwhelmed by the conformism could also refer to "things" the right (the hairstyles of the first long-haired Persian expressing the flower of an elite who had their children studying in Europe against a company "late" compared to "western development" for further discussion refer readers to the "Sermon on the hair" of Pasolini).
In light of all that Guevara became "a shirt that is" mild and disappear with him, men and deep plots weighed down by a huge black cherry!
What's the next show?
Salvo Di Rosa
0 comments:
Post a Comment